South Africa’s next local government elections are set for 4 November 2026, and the timing sharpens one uncomfortable question: does it actually make sense to vote?
Gareth Edwards and Francis Herd begin with the paradox of voting. Statistically, one person’s ballot is unlikely to change the outcome of an election. Voting takes time, effort and research. It comes with opportunity cost. In purely rational terms, staying home can look easier.
But democracy is not lived on paper.
The conversation turns toward the moral, social and practical reasons people still vote. Gareth questions whether peer pressure, shame and the old line that “if you don’t vote, you don’t get to complain” still shape how people think about elections. Francis argues that while voting may seem irrational statistically, there is still a moral and democratic reason to participate.
The local government lens makes the debate sharper. Francis highlights three economic reasons to vote: only 16% of municipalities achieved clean audits, municipalities owe Eskom more than R100 billion, and South Africa faces a further R100 billion backlog in electricity infrastructure maintenance. Add water quality failures, weak accountability and collapsing municipal systems, and the stakes become harder to ignore.
This is not just a conversation about parties. It is about potholes, streetlights, water leaks, sewage, municipal books and whether South Africans still believe their vote can change the place they live.
Voting may feel irrational. Local government failure makes it personal.
Catch up on all Making Sense episodes here: https://www.enca.com/making-sense-south-africas-economic-pulse-budget-2026
